Paper detail

Nanotube bundles and tube-tube orientation: A van der Waals Density Functional Study

We study the binding energy, intertube distance and electronic structure of bundles consisting of single walled carbon nanotubes of the same chirality. We model various nanotube structures (chiralities) and orientations with van der Waals density functional theory. The orientation of the tubes in the bundle strongly influences the properties of the bundles if the chirality of the tubes shares symmetry with the trigonal bundle structure, meaning chiralities which have a $60^\circ$-rotational symmetry (C$_6$-axis), e.g. ($12,0$) bundles. The bundle structure breaks the symmetry depending on the arrangement of the neighboring tubes. Pseudogaps open in the electronic density of states and intertube distances ($\pm5$-10%) vary in dependence of the relative orientation of the tubes in the bundle. Bundles of C$_6$-axis armchair tubes have metallic configurations. A $15^\circ$ rotation off the high symmetry configuration (AA-stacked) of a ($6,6$) bundle shows metallic behavior and has higher binding energy than the high symmetry configuration. We find binding energies between $19 meV/atom$ and $35 meV/atom$, depending on the chirality of the tubes. The intertube distances are between $3.2 Å$ and $3.4 Å$ but independent of orientation for non C$_6$-axis tubes.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.