Paper detail

Nanoparticle Radiosensitization: from extended local effect modeling to a survival modificationframework of compound Poisson additive killing and its carbon dots validation

Objective: To construct an analytical model instead of local effect modeling for the prediction of the biological effectiveness of nanoparticle radiosensitization. Approach: An extended local effects model is first proposed with a more comprehensive description of the nanoparticles mediated local killing enhancements, but meanwhile puts forward challenging issues that remain difficult and need to be further studied. As a novel method instead of local effect modeling, a survival modification framework of compound Poisson additive killing is proposed, as the consequence of an independent additive killing by the assumed equivalent uniform doses of individual nanoparticles per cell under the LQ model. A compound Poisson killing (CPK)model based on the framework is thus derived, giving a general expression of nanoparticle mediated LQ parameter modification. For practical use, a simplified form of the model is also derived, as a concentration dependent correction only to the α parameter, with the relative correction (alpha&#34;/alpha)) dominated by the mean number, and affected by the agglomeration of nanoparticles per cell. For different agglomeration state, a monodispersion model of the dispersity factor η=1, and an agglomeration model of 2/3<η<1,are provided for practical prediction of (alpha&#34;/alpha) value respectively. Main results: Initial validation by the radiosensitization ofHepG2 cells by carbon dots showed a high accuracy of the CPK model. In a safe range of concentration (0.003-0.03 μg/μL)of the carbon dots, the prediction errors of the monodispersion and agglomeration models were both within 2%, relative to the clonogenic survival data of the sensitized HepG2 cells.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.