Paper detail

Nanofibril-mediated Fracture Resistance of Bone

Natural hard composites like human bone possess a combination of strength and toughness that exceeds that of their constituents and of many engineered composites. This augmentation is attributed to their complex hierarchical structure, spanning multiple length scales; in bone, characteristic dimensions range from nanoscale fibrils to microscale lamellae to mesoscale osteons and macroscale organs. The mechanical properties of bone have been studied, with the understanding that the isolated microstructure at micro- and nano-scales gives rise to superior strength compared to that of whole tissue, and the tissue possesses an amplified toughness relative to that of its nanoscale constituents. Nanoscale toughening mechanisms of bone are not adequately understood at sample dimensions that allow for isolating salient microstructural features, because of the challenge of performing fracture experiments on small-sized samples. We developed an in-situ three-point bend experimental methodology that probes site-specific fracture behavior of micron-sized specimens of hard material. Using this, we quantify crack initiation and growth toughness of human trabecular bone with sharp fatigue pre-cracks and blunt notches. Our findings indicate that bone with fatigue cracks is two times tougher than that with blunt cracks. In-situ data-correlated electron microscopy videos reveal this behavior arises from crack-bridging by nanoscale fibril structure. The results reveal a transition between fibril-bridging (~1 $μ$m) and crack deflection/twist (~500 $μ$m) as a function of length-scale, and quantitatively demonstrate hierarchy-induced toughening in a complex material. This versatile approach enables quantifying the relationship between toughness and microstructure in various complex material systems and provides direct insight for designing biomimetic composites.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.