Paper detail

Nanoemulsion stability above the critical micelle concentration: A contest between solubilization, flocculation and Krafft precipitation

The relative importance of micelle solubilization and Krafft temperature on the appraisal of the flocculation rate is studied using a dodecane-in-water nanoemulsion as a model system. In 0.5 mM solutions of sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS), neither the critical micelle concentration (CMC) nor the Krafft point of the surfactant are attained between 300 and 700 mM NaCl and 20 < T < 25 °C. Hence, the addition of salt to a SDS-stabilized nanoemulsion only induces aggregation. Conversely, a surfactant concentration of 7.5 mM SDS promotes micelle solubilization or crystal precipitation depending on the physicochemical conditions. Solubilization decreases the absorbance of the system while flocculation and Krafft precipitation increase it. In this paper, the actual variation of the absorbance above the CMC was followed during five minutes for 300, 500 and 700 mM NaCl. The initial 60-second changes were used to determine apparent aggregation rates. The solubilization capacity of the systems was appraised using plots of absorbance vs. volume fraction of oil for different salt concentrations and observation times. The variation of the Krafft point as a function of the salt concentration was also studied using surfactant solutions and emulsions. Finally, small-scale simulations accounting for micelle solubilization were implemented in order to advance in the comprehension of the problem.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.