Paper detail

$n$ qubits can be entangled in two different ways

In [M. Walter et al., Science 340, 1205, 7 June (2013)], via polytopes they gave a sufficient condition for genuinely entangled pure states and discussed SLOCC classification. In this paper, we study entanglement classification of pure states of $n$ qubits via the basis state matrix (BSM) whose rows are the basis states. We propose a canonical form of BSM obtained by exchanging columns (i.e. permutation of qubits) and rows of BSM and then a necessary and sufficient condition for a genuinely entangled state of n qubits via a canonical form of BSM. Thus, for any $n$ qubits, the genuinely entangled states can be partitioned into two families. One family includes all states whose BSM cannot be transformed into the canonical form. The states with the BSM are always genuinely entangled no matter what the non-zero coefficients are. GHZ and W states belong to the family. The other includes all states whose BSM can be transformed into the canonical form, but for any canonical form of BSM, some two columns or rows of the corresponding coefficient matrix are not proportional. The cluster state belongs to the family.

preprint2024arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.