Paper detail

N-jettiness for muon jet pairs in electroweak high-energy processes

We study the $N$-jettiness in the electroweak high-energy process for the final muon jet pairs, $e^- e^+ \rightarrow μ^+ \ \mathrm{jet} + μ^- \mathrm{jet}$. Compared to QCD, the main difference is that there exist additional gauge nonsinglet contributions in the weak interaction, which make the factorization more elaborate. Especially the nonsinglet contributions arise due to the Block-Nordsieck violation in electroweak processes, which yields the Sudakov logarithms and the rapidity divergence. They change the evolution of the factorized parts considerably in the $N$-jettiness. There are two possible channels, initiated from the gauge bosons $W W \rightarrow \ell_μ \overline{\ell}_μ$, and from the electrons $\ell_e \overline{\ell}_e \rightarrow \ell_μ \overline{\ell}_μ$, where $\ell$ denotes the weak doublet. The latter was discussed previously, and we complete the analysis by studying the first. The factorization for $W W \rightarrow \ell_μ \overline{\ell}_μ$ can be proceeded in a similar way as in the factorization for $\ell_e\overline{\ell}_e \rightarrow \ell_μ \overline{\ell}_μ$, and the result exhibits a rich structure. The new ingredients in this study consist of the $W$ beam functions, and the complex color structure of the soft functions and the hard functions. The resummation of the large logarithms is performed by solving the renormalization group equations with respect to the renormalization scale and the rapidity scale. In the numerical analysis, we confine to the SU(2) weak gauge interaction, and the numerical results are presented for both channels at next-to-leading-logarithmic accuracy including the singlet and the nonsinglet contributions. The nonsinglet contributions turn out to be appreciable in the 2-jettiness.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.