Paper detail

N(H I)/E(B-V)

We explore the relationship between dust-emission derived reddening \EBV\ and atomic hydrogen column density N(H I) derived from 21 cm emission surveys. We consider measurements at galactic latitude $|b| \ga 20$\degr\ and \EBV\ $\la$ 0.1 mag where the interstellar gas is predominantly neutral and atomic and opacity corrections to 21cm H I profiles are small. Over the Galaxy at large at lower resolution in H I, and on smaller scales at higher resolution, we find that the reddening is always much smaller than would be expected from the usually-quoted relation N(H) $ = 5.8\times 10^{21}\pcc$ \EBV\ based on stellar reddening and {\it uv} absorption toward early-type stars. On wide scales, we find N(H I) = $8.3 \times 10^{21}\pcc$ \EBV. We cite various precedents for such a large N(H I)/\EBV\ ratio whenever wide-field 21cm emission surveys are considered, including when reddening based on galaxy counts or colors is substituted for the dust-emission derived reddening measure.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.