Paper detail

Mysterious Triality and Rational Homotopy Theory

Mysterious Duality was discovered by Iqbal, Neitzke, and Vafa in 2001 as a convincing, yet mysterious correspondence between certain symmetry patterns in toroidal compactifications of M-theory and del Pezzo surfaces, both governed by the root system series $E_k$. It turns out that the sequence of del Pezzo surfaces is not the only sequence of objects in mathematics that gives rise to the same $E_k$ symmetry pattern. We present a sequence of topological spaces, starting with the four-sphere $S^4$, and then forming its iterated cyclic loop spaces $\mathcal{L}_c^k S^4$, within which we discover the $E_k$ symmetry pattern via rational homotopy theory. For this sequence of spaces, the correspondence between its $E_k$ symmetry pattern and that of toroidal compactifications of M-theory is no longer a mystery, as each space $\mathcal{L}_c^k S^4$ is naturally related to the compactification of M-theory on the $k$-torus via identification of the equations of motion of $(11-k)$-dimensional supergravity as the defining equations of the Sullivan minimal model of $\mathcal{L}_c^k S^4$. This gives an explicit duality between algebraic topology and physics. Thereby, we extend Iqbal-Neitzke-Vafa's Mysterious Duality between algebraic geometry and physics into a triality, also involving algebraic topology. Via this triality, duality between physics and mathematics is demystified, and the mystery is transferred to the mathematical realm as duality between algebraic geometry and algebraic topology. Now the question is: Is there an explicit relation between the del Pezzo surfaces $\mathbb{B}_k$ and iterated cyclic loop spaces of $S^4$ which would explain the common $E_k$ symmetry pattern?

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.