Paper detail

Mutiwavelength Observations of Radio Galaxy 3C 120 with XMM-Newton

We present XMM-Newton observations of the radio galaxy 3C 120. The hard X-ray spectrum contains a marginally resolved Fe I K-alpha emission line with FWHM=9,000 km/s and an equivalent width of 57 eV. The line arises via fluorescence in a broad-line region with covering fraction of 0.4. There is no evidence of relativistically broad Fe K-alpha, contrary to some previous reports. The normal equivalent widths of the X-ray and optical emission lines exclude a strongly beamed synchrotron component to the hard X-ray and optical continua. There is an excess of 0.3-2 keV soft X-ray continuum over an extrapolation of the hard X-ray power-law, which may arise in a disk corona. Analysis of an archival Chandra image shows that extended emission from the jet and other sources contributes <3% of the total X-ray flux. A break in the X-ray spectrum below 0.6 keV indicates an excess neutral hydrogen column density of N_H=1.57 * 10^21 cm^{-2}. However, the neutral absorber must have an oxygen abundance of <1/50 of the solar value to explain the absence of an intrinsic or intervening O I edge. There is no ionized absorption in the soft X-ray spectrum, but there is a weak, narrow O VIII Ly-alpha emission line. We do not detect previously claimed O VIII absorption from the intervening intergalactic medium. Radio observations at 37 GHz show a fast, high frequency flare starting 8 days after the XMM-Newton observation. However, this has no obvious effect on the X-ray spectrum. The X-ray spectrum, including the soft excess, became harder as the X-ray flux decreased, with an estimated pivot energy of 40 keV. The UV and soft X-ray fluxes are strongly correlated over the 120 ks duration of the XMM-Newton observation. This is qualitatively consistent with Comptonization of UV photons by a hot corona. (Abridged)

preprint2004arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.