Paper detail

Muon to positron conversion

Lepton flavor violation (LFV) has been discovered in the neutrino sector by neutrino oscillation experiments. The minimally extended Standard Model (SM) to include neutrino masses allows LFV in the charged sector (CLFV) at the loop-level, but at rates that are too small to be experimentally observed. Lepton number violation (LNV) is explicitly forbidden even in the minimally extended SM, where the observation of a LNV process would be unambiguous evidence of physics beyond the SM. The search for the LNV and CLFV process $μ^- + N(A,Z) \to e^+ + N'(A,Z-2)$ (referred to as $μ^- \to e^+$ conversion) is a complementary LNV channel to neutrinoless double beta decay searches, sensitive to potential flavor effects in the neutrino mass generation mechanism. A theoretical motivation for $μ^- \to e^+$ conversion is presented along with a review of the status of past $μ^- \to e^+$ conversion experiments and future prospects. Special attention is taken to understanding an uncertain and potentially dominant background for these searches, radiative muon capture, and its potential impacts on current and future $μ^- \to e^+$ searches.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.