Paper detail

Multiwavelength Vertical Structure in the AU Mic Debris Disk: Characterizing the Collisional Cascade

Debris disks are scaled-up analogs of the Kuiper Belt in which dust is generated by collisions between planetesimals. In the "collisional cascade" model of debris disks, dust lost to radiation pressure and winds is constantly replenished by grinding collisions between planetesimals. The model assumes that collisions are destructive and involve large velocities; this assumption has not been tested beyond our Solar System. We present 0"25 ($\approx$2.4 au) resolution observations of the $λ$ = 450 $μ$m dust continuum emission from the debris disk around the nearby M dwarf AU Microscopii with the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array. We use parametric models to describe the disk structure, and an MCMC algorithm to explore the posterior distributions of the model parameters; we fit the structure of the disk to both our data and archival $λ= 1.3$ mm data (Daley et al. 2019), from which we obtain two aspect ratio measurements at 1.3 mm ($h_{1300}$ = 0.025$^{+0.008}_{-0.002}$) and at 450 $μ$m ($h_{450}$ = 0.019$^{+0.006}_{-0.001}$), as well as the grain size distribution index $q =$ 3.03 $\pm$ 0.02. Contextualizing our aspect ratio measurements within the modeling framework laid out in Pan & Schlichting (2012), we derive a power law index of velocity dispersion as a function of grain size $p = 0.28 \pm 0.06$ for the AU Mic debris disk. This result implies that smaller bodies are more easily disrupted than larger bodies by collisions, which is inconsistent with the strength regime usually assumed for such small bodies. Possible explanations for this discrepancy are discussed.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.