Paper detail

Multiwavelength studies of WR 21a and its surroundings

We present results of high-resolution radio continuum observations towards the binary star WR 21a (Wack 2134) obtained with the Australia Telescope Compact Array (ATCA) at 4.8 and 8.64 GHz. We detected the system at 4.8 GHz (6 cm) with a flux density of 0.25+-0.06 mJy and set an upper limit of 0.3 mJy at 8.64 GHz (3 cm). The derived spectral index of alpha < 0.3 [S(nu)=k.nu**(alpha)] suggests the presence of non-thermal emission, probably originating in a colliding-wind region. A second, unrelated radio source was detected ~10" north of WR 21a at (RA, Dec)(J2000)=(10h 25m 56.49, -57deg 48' 34.4", with flux densities of 0.36 and 0.55 mJy at 4.8 and 8.64 GHz, respectively, resulting in alpha = 0.72. HI observations in the area are dominated by absorption against the prominent HII region RCW 49. Analysis of a complete set of archived X-ray observations of WR 21a confirms its strong variability but throws into doubt previous suggestions by Reig (1999) of a period of years for the system. Finally, we comment on the association with the nearby EGRET source 3EG J1027-5817.

preprint2005arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.