Paper detail

Multiwavelength campaign on Mrk 509 VIII. Location of the X-ray absorber

The bright Seyfert 1 galaxy Mrk 509 was monitored by XMM-Newton and other satellites in 2009 to constrain the location of the outflow. We have studied the response of the photoionised gas to changes in the ionising flux produced by the central regions. We used the 5 discrete ionisation components A-E detected in the time-averaged spectrum taken with the RGS. Using the ratio of fluxed EPIC and RGS spectra, we put tight constraints on the variability of the absorbers. Monitoring with the Swift satellite started 6 weeks before the XMM-Newton observations, allowing to use the ionising flux history and to develop a model for the time-dependent photoionisation. Components A and B are too weak for variability studies, but the distance for component A is known from optical imaging of the [O III] line to be ~3 kpc. During the 5 weeks of the XMM-Newton observations we found no evidence of changes in the 3 X-ray dominant ionisation components C-E, despite a huge soft X-ray intensity increase of 60% in the middle of our campaign. This excludes high-density gas close to the black hole. Instead, using our time-dependent modelling, we find low density and derive firm lower limits to the distance of these components. Component D shows evidence for variability on longer time scales, yielding an upper limit to the distance. For component E we derive an upper limit to the distance based on the argument that the thickness of the absorbing layer must be less than its distance to the black hole. Combining these results, at the 90% confidence level, component C has a distance of >70 pc, component D between 5-33 pc, and component E >5 pc but smaller than 21-400 pc, depending upon modelling details. These results are consistent with the upper limits from the HST/COS observations of our campaign and point to an origin of the dominant, slow (v<1000 km/s) outflow components in the NLR or torus-region of Mrk 509.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access17 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.