Paper detail

Multiscale machine-learning interatomic potentials for ferromagnetic and liquid iron

We develop and compare four interatomic potentials for iron: a simple machine-learned embedded atom method (EAM) potential, a potential with machine-learned two- and three-body-dependent terms, a potential with machine-learned EAM and three-body terms, and a Gaussian approximation potential with the SOAP descriptor. All potentials are trained to the same diverse database of body-centered cubic and liquid structures computed with density functional theory. The four presented potentials represent different levels of complexity and span three orders of magnitude in computational cost. The first three potentials are tabulated and evaluated efficiently using cubic spline interpolations, while the fourth one is implemented without additional optimization. We compare and discuss the advantages of each implementation, transferability and applicability in terms of the balance between required accuracy versus computational cost.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.