Paper detail

Multiplicity per rapidity in Carruthers and hadron resonance gas approaches

The multiplicity per rapidity of the well-identified particles $π^{-}$, $π^{+}$, $k^{-}$, $k^{+}$, $\bar{p}$, $p$, and $p-\bar{p}$ measured in different high-energy experiments, at energies ranging from $6.3$ to $5500~$GeV, are successfully compared with the Cosmic Ray Monte Carlo (CRMC) event generator. For these rapidity distributions, we introduce a theoretical approach based on fluctuations and correlations (Carruthers) and another one based on statistical thermal assumptions (hadron resonance gas model). Both approaches are fitted to the two sets of results deduced from experiments and simulations. We found that the Carruthers approach reproduces well the full range of multiplicity per rapidity for all produced particles, at the various energies, while the HRG approach fairly describes the results within a narrower rapidity-range. While the Carruthers approach seems to match well with the Gaussian normal distribution, ingredients such as flow and interactions should be first incorporated in the HRG approach.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.