Paper detail

Multiplicity and stability of closed characteristics on compact convex P-cyclic symmetric hypersurfaces in ${\bf R}^{2n}$

Let $Σ$ be a compact convex hypersurface in ${\bf R}^{2n}$ which is P-cyclic symmetric, i.e., $x\in Σ$ implies $Px\inΣ$ with P being a $2n\times2n$ symplectic orthogonal matrix and satisfying $P^k=I_{2n}$, $ker(P^l-I_{2n})=0$ for $1\leq l< k$, where $n, k\geq2$. In this paper, we prove that there exist at least $n$ geometrically distinct closed characteristics on $Σ$, which solves a longstanding conjecture about the multiplicity of closed characteristics for a broad class of compact convex hypersurfaces with symmetries(cf.,Page 235 of \cite{Eke1}). Based on the proof, we further prove that if the number of geometrically distinct closed characteristics on $Σ$ is finite, then at least $2[\frac{n}{2}]$ of them are non-hyperbolic; and if the number of geometrically distinct closed characteristics on $Σ$ is exactly $n$ and $k\geq3$, then all of them are P-cyclic symmetric, where a closed characteristic $(τ, y)$ on $Σ$ is called P-cyclic symmetric if $y({\bf R})=Py({\bf R})$.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.