Paper detail

Multiplicities in GGGRs for Classical Type Groups with Connected Centre I

Assume $G$ is a connected reductive algebraic group defined over $\bar{\mathbb{F}_p}$ such that $p$ is good prime for $G$. Furthermore we assume that $Z(G)$ is connected and $G/Z(G)$ is simple of classical type. Let $F$ be a Frobenius endomorphism of $G$ admitting an $\mathbb{F}_q$-rational structure $G^F$. This paper is one of a series whose overall goal is to compute explicitly the multiplicity $< D_0745664 {G^F}(Γ_u),χ>$ where: $χ$ is an irreducible character of $G^F$, $D_{G^F}(Γ_u)$ is the Alvis--Curtis dual of a generalised Gelfand--Graev representation of $G^F$ and $u \in G^F$ is contained in the unipotent support of $χ$. In this paper we complete the first step towards this goal. Namely we explicitly compute, under some restrictions on $q$, the scalars relating the characteristic functions of character sheaves of $G$ to the almost characters of $G^F$ whenever the support of the character sheaf contains a unipotent element. We achieve this by adapting a method of Lusztig who answered this question when $G$ is a special orthogonal group $\SO_{2n+1}(\mathbb{K})$. Consequently the main result of this paper is due to Lusztig when $G = \SO_{2n+1}(\mathbb{K})$.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.