Paper detail

Multiple stellar populations in the globular cluster NGC 1851

[Abridged] Detailed chemical tagging of individual stellar populations in the Galactic globular cluster (GC) NGC 1851 is presented. Abundances are derived from FLAMES spectra for the largest sample of giants (124) ever analysed in this peculiar GC using O, Na, Mg, Al, Si, Ca, Ti, Sc, V, Mn, Co, Ni, Cu, Y, Zr, Ba, La, Ce, Nd, Eu, Dy. We confirm a [Fe/H] spread in this GC, but too small to clearly separate different sub-populations. We instead propose a classification using a combination of Fe and Ba (much more abundant in the more metal-rich group) through a cluster analysis: we separated stars into a metal-rich (MR) and a metal-poor (MP) populations, each of them showing a Na-O anticorrelation, signature of genuine GC, although with different ratios of primordial to polluted stars. The ratio [alpha/H] tracks iron and is higher in the MR population, suggesting an additional contribution by core-collapse supernovae. The MR population shows a larger enrichment in s-process elements compared to the MP one. This is probably due to the contribution by intermediate-low mass stars, because we find that the level of heavy s-process elements is larger than the level of light s-process nuclei in the MR stars; however, a large contribution by low mass stars is unlikely, because it would likely cancel the O-Na anticorrelation. We also confirm the presence of correlations between p-capture and s-process elements previously found by other studies, at least for the MR population. This finding apparently requires a quite long delay for the second generation of the MR component. A merger of two distinct GCs in a parent dwarf galaxy, each one with a different Ba level and an age difference of ~1 Gyr, might explain (i) the double SGB, (ii) a possible difference in C content between the two original GCs, and (iii) the Stromgren photometry of this peculiar GC.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.