Paper detail

Multiple positive solutions for a class of Kirchhoff type problems involving general critical growth

In this paper, we study the following nonlinear Kirchhoff problem involving critical growth: $$ \left\{% \begin{array}{ll} -(a+b\int_Ω|\nabla u|^2dx)Δu=|u|^4u+λ|u|^{q-2}u, u=0\ \ \text{on}\ \ \partialΩ, \end{array}% \right. $$ where $1<q<2$, $λ,\ a,\ b>0$ are parameters and $Ω$ is a bounded domain in $\R^3$. We prove that there exists $λ_1=λ_1(q,Ω)>0$ such that for any $λ\in(0,λ_1)$ and $a,\ b>0$, the above Kirchhoff problem possesses at least two positive solutions and one of them is a positive ground state solution. We also establish the convergence property of the ground state solution as the parameter $b\searrow 0$. More generally, we obtain the same results about the following Kirchhoff problem: $$ \left\{% \begin{array}{ll} -(a+b\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}|\nabla u|^2dx)Δu+u=Q(x)|u|^4u+λf(x)|u|^{q-2}u, u\in H^1(\mathbb{R}^3), \end{array}% \right. $$ for any $a,\ b>0$ and $λ\in \big(0,λ_0(q,Q,f)\big)$ under certain conditions of $f(x)$ and $Q(x)$. Finally, we investigate the depending relationship between $λ_0$ and $b$ to show that for any (large) $λ>0$, there exists a $b_0(λ)>0$ such that the above results hold when $b>b_0(λ)$ and $a>0$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.