Paper detail

Multiple minimum energy paths and scenarios of unwinding transitions in chiral nematic liquid crystals

We apply the minimum energy paths (MEPs) approach to study the helix unwinding transition in chiral nematic liquid crystals. A mechanism of the transition is determined by a MEP passing through a first order saddle point on the free energy surface. The energy difference between the saddle point and the initial state gives the energy barrier of the transition. Two starting approximations for the paths are used to find the MEPs representing different transition scenarios: (a) the director slippage approximation with in-plane helical structures; and (b) the anchoring breaking approximation that involves the structures with profound out-of-plane director deviations. It is shown that, at sufficiently low voltages, the unwinding transition is solely governed by the director slippage mechanism with the planar saddle point structures. When the applied voltage exceeds its critical value below the threshold of the Freedericksz transition, the additional scenario through the anchoring breaking transitions is found to come into play. For these transitions, the saddle point structure is characterized by out-of-plane deformations localized near the bounding surface. The energy barriers for different paths of transitions are computed as a function of the voltage and the anchoring energy strengths.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.