Paper detail

Multiple hypothesis testing adjusted for latent variables, with an application to the AGEMAP gene expression data

In high throughput settings we inspect a great many candidate variables (e.g., genes) searching for associations with a primary variable (e.g., a phenotype). High throughput hypothesis testing can be made difficult by the presence of systemic effects and other latent variables. It is well known that those variables alter the level of tests and induce correlations between tests. They also change the relative ordering of significance levels among hypotheses. Poor rankings lead to wasteful and ineffective follow-up studies. The problem becomes acute for latent variables that are correlated with the primary variable. We propose a two-stage analysis to counter the effects of latent variables on the ranking of hypotheses. Our method, called LEAPP, statistically isolates the latent variables from the primary one. In simulations, it gives better ordering of hypotheses than competing methods such as SVA and EIGENSTRAT. For an illustration, we turn to data from the AGEMAP study relating gene expression to age for 16 tissues in the mouse. LEAPP generates rankings with greater consistency across tissues than the rankings attained by the other methods.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.