Paper detail

Multiple Emotion Descriptors Estimation at the ABAW3 Challenge

To describe complex emotional states, psychologists have proposed multiple emotion descriptors: sparse descriptors like facial action units; continuous descriptors like valence and arousal; and discrete class descriptors like happiness and anger. According to Ekman and Friesen, 1969, facial action units are sign vehicles that convey the emotion message, while discrete or continuous emotion descriptors are the messages perceived and expressed by human. In this paper, we designed an architecture for multiple emotion descriptors estimation in participating the ABAW3 Challenge. Based on the theory of Ekman and Friesen, 1969, we designed distinct architectures to measure the sign vehicles (i.e., facial action units) and the message (i.e., discrete emotions, valence and arousal) given their different properties. The quantitative experiments on the ABAW3 challenge dataset has shown the superior performance of our approach over two baseline models.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.