Paper detail

Multiple bifurcations and transitions for electrically charged monopole-antimonopole chain and vortex-ring solutions

The dependence of physical properties of the electrically charged two-poles monopole-antimonopole pair (MAP) solutions in the Higgs self-coupling constant is previously investigated. In this paper we study the three-poles monopole-antimonopole chain (MAC) solutions. The study includes $ϕ$-winding number $n=2,3,4$, and $5$. For the case of $n=2$, there is no bifurcating branch along with the fundamental solution. Also no transition happens for this solution for the Higgs self-coupling interval of $0\leq λ\leq 144$. For the case of $n=3$, two transitions happen along the fundamental solution. Also at a higher energy, there are two bifurcating branches. The lower energy branch of these bifurcating branches, merges with the fundamental solution and both terminate at the convergence point and do not survive for larger values of $λ$. For $n=4$, a bifurcation is observed at higher energy in comparison with the fundamental solution. Here there are three transitions. One is observed along the fundamental solution and the others happen along the higher energy bifurcating branch. For the case of $n=5$, the pattern is more complex. A bifurcation in $λ= λ_{b1}$ happens with a higher energy than the fundamental solution. A second bifurcation is observed at $λ= λ_{b2}$. The two branches of the second bifurcation are both very close in energy to the lower energy branch of the first bifurcation, but they have different electrical and geometrical properties. Therefore, for the case of $n=5$, we have three distinct solution for the interval of $λ_{b1}\leq λ\leq λ_{b2}$ and five distinct solutions for $λ_{b2}\leq λ\leq 300$. Also two transitions are observed in the higher energy branch of the first bifurcation.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.