Paper detail

Multimarginal Wasserstein Barycenter for Stain Normalization and Augmentation

Variations in hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained images (due to clinical lab protocols, scanners, etc) directly impact the quality and accuracy of clinical diagnosis, and hence it is important to control for these variations for a reliable diagnosis. In this work, we present a new approach based on the multimarginal Wasserstein barycenter to normalize and augment H&E stained images given one or more references. Specifically, we provide a mathematically robust way of naturally incorporating additional images as intermediate references to drive stain normalization and augmentation simultaneously. The presented approach showed superior results quantitatively and qualitatively as compared to state-of-the-art methods for stain normalization. We further validated our stain normalization and augmentations in the nuclei segmentation task on a publicly available dataset, achieving state-of-the-art results against competing approaches.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.