Paper detail

Multilevel Richardson-Romberg extrapolation

We propose and analyze a Multilevel Richardson-Romberg (MLRR) estimator which combines the higher order bias cancellation of the Multistep Richardson-Romberg method introduced in [Pa07] and the variance control resulting from the stratification introduced in the Multilevel Monte Carlo (MLMC) method (see [Hei01, Gi08]). Thus, in standard frameworks like discretization schemes of diffusion processes, the root mean squared error (RMSE) $\varepsilon > 0$ can be achieved with our MLRR estimator with a global complexity of $\varepsilon^{-2} \log(1/\varepsilon)$ instead of $\varepsilon^{-2} (\log(1/\varepsilon))^2$ with the standard MLMC method, at least when the weak error $\mathbf{E}[Y_h]-\mathbf{E}[Y_0]$ of the biased implemented estimator $Y_h$ can be expanded at any order in $h$ and $\|Y_h - Y_0\|_2 = O(h^{\frac{1}{2}})$. The MLRR estimator is then halfway between a regular MLMC and a virtual unbiased Monte Carlo. When the strong error $\|Y_h - Y_0\|_2 = O(h^{\fracβ{2}})$, $β< 1$, the gain of MLRR over MLMC becomes even more striking. We carry out numerical simulations to compare these estimators in two settings: vanilla and path-dependent option pricing by Monte Carlo simulation and the less classical Nested Monte Carlo simulation.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.