Paper detail

Multilevel Monte Carlo for quantum mechanics on a lattice

Monte Carlo simulations of quantum field theories on a lattice become increasingly expensive as the continuum limit is approached since the cost per independent sample grows with a high power of the inverse lattice spacing. Simulations on fine lattices suffer from critical slowdown, the rapid growth of autocorrelations in the Markov chain. This causes a strong increase in the number of lattice configurations that have to be generated to obtain statistically significant results. This paper discusses hierarchical sampling methods to tame the growth in autocorrelations. Combined with multilevel variance reduction, this significantly reduces the computational cost of simulations for given tolerances $ε_{\text{disc}}$ on the discretisation error and $ε_{\text{stat}}$ on the statistical error. For observables with lattice errors of order $α$ and integrated autocorrelation times that grow like $τ_{\mathrm{int}}\propto a^{-z}$, multilevel Monte Carlo (MLMC) reduces the cost from $\mathcal{O}(ε_{\text{stat}}^{-2}ε_{\text{disc}}^{-(1+z)/α})$ to $\mathcal{O}(ε_{\text{stat}}^{-2}\vert\log ε_{\text{disc}} \vert^2+ε_{\text{disc}}^{-1/α})$ or $\mathcal{O}(ε_{\text{stat}}^{-2}+ε_{\text{disc}}^{-1/α})$. Higher gains are expected for simulations of quantum field theories in $D$ dimensions. The efficiency of the approach is demonstrated on two model systems, including a topological oscillator that is badly affected by critical slowdown from topological charge freezing. On fine lattices, the new methods are orders of magnitude faster than standard Hybrid Monte Carlo sampling. For high resolutions, MLMC can be used to accelerate even the cluster algorithm for the topological oscillator. Performance is further improved through perturbative matching which guarantees efficient coupling of theories on the multilevel hierarchy.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.