Paper detail

Multidimensional Balanced Allocation for Multiple Choice & (1 + Beta) Processes

Allocation of balls into bins is a well studied abstraction for load balancing problems.The literature hosts numerous results for sequential(single dimensional) allocation case when m balls are thrown into n bins. In this paper we study the symmetric multiple choice process for both unweighted and weighted balls as well as for both multidimensional and scalar models.Additionally,we present the results on bounds on gap for (1+beta) choice process with multidimensional balls and bins. We show that for the symmetric d choice process and with m=O(n), the upper bound on the gap is O(lnln(n)) w.h.p.This upper bound on the gap is within D=f factor of the lower bound. This is the first such tight result.For the general case of m>>n the expected gap is bounded by O(lnln(n)).For variable f and non-uniform distribution of the populated dimensions,we obtain the upper bound on the expected gap as O(log(n)). Further,for the multiple round parallel balls and bins,we show that the gap is also bounded by O(loglog(n)) for m=O(n).The same bound holds for the expected gap when m>>n. Our analysis also has strong implications in the sequential scalar case.For the weighted balls and bins and general case m>>n,we show that the upper bound on the expected gap is O(log(n)) which improves upon the best prior bound of n^c.Moreover,we show that for the (1 + beta) choice process and m=O(n) the upper bound(assuming uniform distribution of f populated dimensions over D total dimensions) on the gap is O(log(n)/beta),which is within D=f factor of the lower bound.For fixed f with non-uniform distribution and for random f with Binomial distribution the expected gap remains O(log(n)/beta) independent of the total number of balls thrown. This is the first such tight result for (1 +beta) paradigm with multidimensional balls and bins.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.