Paper detail

Multicolor Optical Monitoring of the Blazar S5 0716+714 from 2017 to 2019

We continuously monitored the blazar S5 0716+714 in the optical $g$, $r$ and $i$ bands from Nov. 10, 2017 to Jun. 06, 2019. The total number of observations is 201 nights including 26973 data points. This is a very large quasi-simultaneous multicolor sample for the blazar. The average time spans and time resolutions are 3.4 hours and 2.9 minutes per night, respectively. During the period of observations, the target source in the $r$ band brightens from $14^{\rm m}.16$ to $12^{\rm m}.29$ together with five prominent sub-flares, and then first becomes fainter to $14^{\rm m}.76$ and again brightens to $12^{\rm m}.94$ with seven prominent sub-flares. For the long-term variations, we find a strong flatter when brighter (FWB) trend at a low flux state and then a weak FWB trend at a higher flux state. A weak FWB trend at a low flux state and then a strong FWB trend at a higher flux state are also reported. Most of sub-flares show the strong FWB trends, except for two flares with a weak FWB trend. The particle acceleration and cooling mechanisms together with the superposition of different FWB-slopes from sub-flares are likely to explain the optical color behaviours. A scenario of bent jet is discussed.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access10 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.