Paper detail

Multi-wavelength Diameters of Nearby Miras and Semiregulars

We have used optical interferometry to obtain multi-wavelength visibility curves for eight red giants over the wavelength range 650--1000 nm. The observations consist of wavelength-dispersed fringes recorded with MAPPIT (Masked APerture-Plane Interference Telescope) at the 3.9-m Anglo-Australian Telescope. We present results for four Miras (R Car, $o$ Cet, R Hya, R Leo) and four semi-regular variables (R Dor, W Hya, L$_2$ Pup, $γ$ Cru). All stars except $γ$ Cru show strong variations of angular size with wavelength. A uniform-disk model was found to be a poor fit in most cases, with Gaussian (or other more tapered profiles) preferred. This, together with the fact that most stars showed a systematic increase in apparent size toward the blue and a larger-than-expected linear size, even in the red, all point toward significant scattering by dust in the inner circumstellar environment. Some stars showed evidence for asymmetric brightness profiles, while L$_2$ Pup required a two-component model, indicating an asymmetrical circumstellar dust shell.

preprint2004arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.