Paper detail

Multi-User Diversity with Random Number of Users

Multi-user diversity is considered when the number of users in the system is random. The complete monotonicity of the error rate as a function of the (deterministic) number of users is established and it is proved that randomization of the number of users always leads to deterioration of average system performance at any average SNR. Further, using stochastic ordering theory, a framework for comparison of system performance for different user distributions is provided. For Poisson distributed users, the difference in error rate of the random and deterministic number of users cases is shown to asymptotically approach zero as the average number of users goes to infinity for any fixed average SNR. In contrast, for a finite average number of users and high SNR, it is found that randomization of the number of users deteriorates performance significantly, and the diversity order under fading is dominated by the smallest possible number of users. For Poisson distributed users communicating over Rayleigh faded channels, further closed-form results are provided for average error rate, and the asymptotic scaling law for ergodic capacity is also provided. Simulation results are provided to corroborate our analytical findings.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.