Paper detail

Multi-thermal dynamics and energetics of a coronal mass ejection in the low solar atmosphere

The aim of this work is to determine the multi-thermal characteristics and plasma energetics of an eruptive plasmoid and occulted flare observed by Solar Dynamics Observatory/Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (SDO/AIA). We study an event from 03-Nov-2010 (peaking at 12:20UT in GOES soft X-rays) of a coronal mass ejection and occulted flare which demonstrates the morphology of a classic erupting flux rope. The high spatial, and time resolution, and six coronal channels, of the SDO/AIA images allows the dynamics of the multi-thermal emission during the initial phases of eruption to be studied in detail. The Differential Emission Measure (DEM) is calculated, using an optimised version of a regularized inversion method (Hannah & Kontar 2012), for each pixel across the six channels at different times, resulting in emission measure maps and movies in a variety of temperature ranges. We find that the core of the erupting plasmoid is hot (8-11, 11-14MK) with a similarly hot filamentary "stem" structure connecting it to the lower atmosphere, which could be interpreted as the current sheet in the flux rope model, though is wider than these models suggest. The velocity of the leading edge of the eruption is 597-664 km s$^{-1}$ in the temperature range $\ge$3-4MK and between 1029-1246 km s$^{-1}$ for $\le$2-3MK. We estimate the density (in 11-14 MK) of the erupting core and stem during the impulsive phase to be about $3\times10^9$ cm$^{-3}$, $6\times10^9$ cm$^{-3}$, $9\times10^8$ cm$^{-3}$ in the plasmoid core, stem and surrounding envelope of material. This gives thermal energy estimates of $5\times10^{29}$ erg, $1\times10^{29}$ erg and $2\times10^{30}$ erg. The kinetic energy for the core and envelope is slightly smaller. The thermal energy of the core and current sheet grows during the eruption, suggesting continuous influx of energy presumably via reconnection.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.