Paper detail

Multi-scale simulations of merging galaxies with supermassive black holes

We present the results of the first multi-scale N-Body+SPH simulations of merging galaxies containing central supermassive black holes (SMBHs) and having a spatial resolution of only a few parsecs. Strong gas inflows associated with equal-mass mergers produce non-axisymmetric nuclear disks with masses of order $10^9 M_{\odot}$, resolved by about $10^6$ SPH particles. Such disks have sizes of several hundred parsecs but most of their mass is concentrated within less than $50$ pc. We find that a close SMBH pair forms after the merger. The separation of the two SMBHs then shrinks further owing to dynamical friction against the predominantly gaseous background. The orbits of the SMBHs decay down to the minimum resolvable scale in a few million years for an ambient gas temperature and density typical of a region undergoing a starburst. These results suggest the initial conditions necessary for the eventual coalescence of the two holes arise naturally from the merging of two equal-mass galaxies whose structure and orbits are consistent with the predictions of the $Λ$CDM model. Our findings have important implications for planned gravitational wave detection experiments such as {\it LISA}.

preprint2006arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.