Paper detail

Multi Loci Phylogenetic Analysis with Gene Tree Clustering

Summary: Both theory and empirical evidence indicate that phylogenies (trees) of different genes (loci) do not display precisely matched topologies. This phylogenetic incongruence is attributed to the reticulated evolutionary history of most species due to meiotic sexual recombination in eukaryotes, or horizontal transfers of genetic materials in prokaryotes. Nonetheless, most genes do display topologically related phylogenies; this implies they form cohesive subsets (clusters). In this work, we compare popular clustering methods, and show how the performance of the normalized cut framework is efficient and statistically accurate when obtaining clusters on the set of gene trees based on the geodesic distance between them over the Billera-Holmes-Vogtmann (BHV) tree space. We proceed to present a computational study on the performance of different clustering methods with and without preprocessing under different distance metrics and using a series of dimension reduction techniques. Results: First, we show using simulated data that indeed the Ncut framework accurately clusters the set of gene trees given a species tree under the coalescent process. We then depict the success of our framework by comparing its performance to other clustering techniques, including k-means and hierarchical clustering. The main computational results can be summarized to the stellar performance of the Ncut framework even without dimension reduction, the similar performance portrayed by k-means and Ncut under most dimension reduction schemes, the utter failure of hierarchical clustering to accurately capture clusters, as well as the significantly better performance of the NJp method, as compared to MLE.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.