Paper detail

Multi-jets structure rather than rotation of the NGC 1333 IRAS 4A2 protostellar jets

We analyze the velocity gradient across the jets of the young stellar object (YSO) NGC 1333 IRAS 4A2 and explain it by decomposing the two opposite jets to two opposite sub-jets. The two sub-jets have the same radial velocity and the angle between them is only several degrees. Each of the two sub-jets is composed of two components. We also show that the alternative interpretation of jets' rotation is unlikely to account for the velocity gradient. The two sub-jets directions are constant, and there is no indication for precession. The line connecting the centers of the sub-jets defines a preferred direction in a plane parallel to the accretion disk launching the jets. We suggest that the preferred constant direction in the accretion disk is determined by the semi-major axis of a highly eccentric orbit of a brown dwarf or a massive planet companion. At each periastron passage the companion perturbs the accretion disk with a quadrupole mode, e.g., two spiral arms, that lead to the launching of the two sub-jets. We predict that a careful monitoring of the system will reveal a periodic activity with a period of few months to several years.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.