Paper detail

Multi-Hop Network with Multiple Decision Centers under Expected-Rate Constraints

We consider a multi-hop distributed hypothesis testing problem with multiple decision centers (DCs) for testing against independence and where the observations obey some Markov chain. For this system, we characterize the fundamental type-II error exponents region, i.e., the type-II error exponents that the various DCs can achieve simultaneously, under expected rate-constraints. Our results show that this fundamental exponents region is boosted compared to the region under maximum-rate constraints, and that it depends on the permissible type-I error probabilities. When all DCs have equal permissible type-I error probabilities, the exponents region is rectangular and all DCs can simultaneously achieve their optimal type-II error exponents. When the DCs have different permissible type-I error probabilities, a tradeoff between the type-II error exponents at the different DCs arises. New achievability and converse proofs are presented. For the achievability, a new multiplexing and rate-sharing strategy is proposed. The converse proof is based on applying different change of measure arguments in parallel and on proving asymptotic Markov chains. For the special cases $K = 2$ and $K = 3$, we provide simplified expressions for the exponents region; a similar simplification is conjectured for arbitrary $K\geq 2$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.