Paper detail

Multi-frequency polarization properties of ten quasars on deca-parsec scales at z > 3

Global VLBI (EVN+VLBA) polarization observations at 5 and 8.4 GHz of ten high redshift (z > 3) quasars are presented. The core and jet brightness temperatures are found through modelling the self-calibrated uv-data with Gaussian components, which provide reliable estimates of the flux density and size of individual components. The observed high core brightness temperatures (median $T_{\rm b,\,core}=4\times10^{11}$ K) are consistent with Doppler boosted emission from a relativistic jet orientated close to the line-of-sight. This can also explain the dramatic jet bends observed for some of our sources since small intrinsic bends can be significantly amplified due to projection effects in a highly beamed relativistic jet. We also model-fit the polarized emission and, by taking the minimum angle separation between the model-fitted polarization angles at 5 and 8.4 GHz, we calculate the minimum inferred Faraday rotation measure (RM$_{\rm min}$) for each component. We also calculate the minimum intrinsic RM in the rest frame of the AGN (RM$_{\rm min}^{\rm intr}$ = RM$_{\rm min} (1+z)^2$), first subtracting the integrated (presumed foreground) RM in those cases where we felt we could do this reliably. The resulting mean core $|$RM$_{\rm min}^{\rm intr}|$ is 5580 rad m$^{-2}$, with a standard deviation of 3390 rad m$^{-2}$, for four high-z quasars for which we believe we could reliably remove the foreground RM. We find relatively steep core and jet spectral index values, with a median core spectral index of -0.3 and a median jet spectral index of -1.0. Comparing our results with RM observations of more nearby Active Galactic Nuclei at similar emitted frequencies does not provide any significant evidence for dependence of the quasar nuclear environment with redshift.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.