Paper detail

Multi-frequency constraints on the non-thermal pressure in galaxy clusters

The origin of radio halos in galaxy clusters is still unknown and is the subject of a vibrant debate both from the observational and theoretical point of view. In particular the amount and the nature of non-thermal plasma and of the magnetic field energy density in clusters hosting radio halos is still unclear. The aim of this paper is to derive an estimate of the pressure ratio X between the non-thermal and thermal plasma in radio halo clusters that have combined radio, X-ray and SZ effect observations. From the simultaneous P_{1.4}-L_X and P_{1.4}-Y_{SZ} correlations for a sample of clusters observed with Planck, we derive a correlation between Y_{SZ} and L_X that we use to derive a value for X. This is possible since the Compton parameter Y_{SZ} is proportional to the total plasma pressure in the cluster (that we characterize as the sum of the thermal and non-thermal pressure) while the X-ray luminosity L_X is proportional only to the thermal pressure of the intracluster plasma. Our results indicate that the average (best fit) value of the pressure ratio in a self-similar cluster formation model is X =0.55 \pm 0.05 in the case of an isothermal beta-model with beta=2/3 and a core radius r_c = 0.3 R_{500} holding on average for the cluster sample. We also show that the theoretical prediction for the Y_{SZ}-L_X correlation in this model has a slope that is steeper than the best fit value for the available data. The agreement with the data can be recovered if the pressure ratio X decreases with increasing X-ray luminosity as L_X^{-0.96}. We conclude that the available data on radio halo clusters indicate a substantial amount of non-thermal pressure in cluster atmospheres whose value must decrease with increasing X-ray luminosity, or increasing cluster mass (temperature). (abridged)

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.