Paper detail

Multi-epoch X-ray burst modelling: MCMC with large grids of 1D simulations

Type-I X-ray bursts are recurring thermonuclear explosions on the surface of accreting neutron stars. Matching observed bursts to computational models can help to constrain system properties, such as the neutron star mass and radius, crustal heating rates, and the accreted fuel composition, but systematic parameter studies to date have been limited. We apply Markov chain Monte Carlo methods to 1D burst models for the first time, and obtain system parameter estimations for the `Clocked Burster', GS 1826$-$238, by fitting multiple observed epochs simultaneously. We explore multiple parameters which are often held constant, including the neutron star mass, crustal heating rate, and hydrogen composition. To improve the computational efficiency, we precompute a grid of 3840 KEPLER models - the largest set of 1D burst simulations to date - and by interpolating over the model grid, we can rapidly sample burst predictions. We obtain estimates for a CNO metallicity of $Z_\mathrm{CNO} = 0.010^{+0.005}_{-0.004}$, a hydrogen fraction of $X_0 = 0.74^{+0.02}_{-0.03}$, a distance of $d \sqrt{ξ_\mathrm{b}} = 6.5^{+0.4}_{-0.6}\, \mathrm{kpc}$, and a system inclination of $i = {69^{+2}_{-3}}^{\circ}$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.