Paper detail

Multi-dimensional models of circumstellar shells around evolved massive stars

Massive stars shape their surrounding medium through the force of their stellar winds, which collide with the circumstellar medium. Because the characteristics of these stellar winds vary over the course of the evolution of the star, the circumstellar matter becomes a reflection of the stellar evolution and can be used to determine the characteristics of the progenitor star. In particular, whenever a fast wind phase follows a slow wind phase, the fast wind sweeps up its predecessor in a shell, which is observed as a circumstellar nebula. We make 2-D and 3-D numerical simulations of fast stellar winds sweeping up their slow predecessors to investigate whether numerical models of these shells have to be 3-D, or whether 2-D models are sufficient to reproduce the shells correctly. We focus on those situations where a fast Wolf-Rayet (WR) star wind sweeps up the slower wind emitted by its predecessor, being either a red supergiant or a luminous blue variable. As the fast WR wind expands, it creates a dense shell of swept up material that expands outward, driven by the high pressure of the shocked WR wind. These shells are subject to a fair variety of hydrodynamic-radiative instabilities. If the WR wind is expanding into the wind of a luminous blue variable phase, the instabilities will tend to form a fairly small-scale, regular filamentary lattice with thin filaments connecting knotty features. If the WR wind is sweeping up a red supergiant wind, the instabilities will form larger interconnected structures with less regularity. Our results show that 3-D models, when translated to observed morphologies, give realistic results that can be compared directly to observations. The 3-D structure of the nebula will help to distinguish different progenitor scenarios.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.