Paper detail

Multi-dimensional extensions of the Hegselmann-Krause model

In this paper, we consider two multi-dimensional Hagselmann-Krause (HK) models for opinion dynamics. The two models describe how individuals adjust their opinions on multiple topics, based on the influence of their peers. The models differ in the criterion according to which individuals decide whom they want to be influenced from. In the average-based model, individuals compare their average opinions on the various topics with those of the other individuals and interact only with those individuals whose average opinions lie within a confidence interval. For this model, we provide an alternative proof for the contractivity of the range of opinions and show that the agents' opinions reach consensus/clustering if and only if their average opinions do so. In the uniform affinity model agents compare their opinions on every single topic and influence each other only if, topic-wise, such opinions do not differ more than a given tolerance. We identify conditions under which the uniform affinity model enjoys the order-preservation property topic-wise and we prove that the global range of opinions (and hence the range of opinions on every single topic) are nonincreasing.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.