Paper detail

MULTI-CASE: A Transformer-based Ethics-aware Multimodal Investigative Intelligence Framework

AI-driven models are increasingly deployed in operational analytics solutions, for instance, in investigative journalism or the intelligence community. Current approaches face two primary challenges: ethical and privacy concerns, as well as difficulties in efficiently combining heterogeneous data sources for multimodal analytics. To tackle the challenge of multimodal analytics, we present MULTI-CASE, a holistic visual analytics framework tailored towards ethics-aware and multimodal intelligence exploration, designed in collaboration with domain experts. It leverages an equal joint agency between human and AI to explore and assess heterogeneous information spaces, checking and balancing automation through Visual Analytics. MULTI-CASE operates on a fully-integrated data model and features type-specific analysis with multiple linked components, including a combined search, annotated text view, and graph-based analysis. Parts of the underlying entity detection are based on a RoBERTa-based language model, which we tailored towards user requirements through fine-tuning. An overarching knowledge exploration graph combines all information streams, provides in-situ explanations, transparent source attribution, and facilitates effective exploration. To assess our approach, we conducted a comprehensive set of evaluations: We benchmarked the underlying language model on relevant NER tasks, achieving state-of-the-art performance. The demonstrator was assessed according to intelligence capability assessments, while the methodology was evaluated according to ethics design guidelines. As a case study, we present our framework in an investigative journalism setting, supporting war crime investigations. Finally, we conduct a formative user evaluation with domain experts in law enforcement. Our evaluations confirm that our framework facilitates human agency and steering in security-sensitive applications.

preprint2024arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.