Paper detail

Multi-bubble nodal solutions to slightly subcritical elliptic problems with Hardy terms in symmetric domains

We consider the slightly subcritical elliptic problem with Hardy term $$ \left\{ \begin{aligned} -Δu-μ\frac{u}{|x|^2} &= |u|^{2^{\ast}-2-ε}u &&\quad \text{in } Ω\subset\mathbb{R}^N, \\\ u &= 0&&\quad \text{on } \partial Ω, \end{aligned} \right. $$ where $0\inΩ$ and $Ω$ is invariant under the subgroup $SO(2)\times\{\pm E_{N-2}\}\subset O(N)$; here $E_n$ denots the $n\times n$ identity matrix. If $μ=μ_0ε^α$ with $μ_0>0$ fixed and $α>\frac{N-4}{N-2}$ the existence of nodal solutions that blow up, as $ε\to0^+$, positively at the origin and negatively at a different point in a general bounded domain has been proved in \cite{BarGuo-ANS}. Solutions with more than two blow-up points have not been found so far. In the present paper we obtain the existence of nodal solutions with a positive blow-up point at the origin and $k=2$ or $k=3$ negative blow-up points placed symmetrically in $Ω\cap(\mathbb{R}^2\times\{0\})$ around the origin provided a certain function $f_k:\mathbb{R}^+\times\mathbb{R}^+\times I\to\mathbb{R}$ has stable critical points; here $I=\{t>0:(t,0,\dots,0)\inΩ\}$. If $Ω=B(0,1)\subset\mathbb{R}^N$ is the unit ball centered at the origin we obtain two solutions for $k=2$ and $N\ge7$, or $k=3$ and $N$ large. The result is optimal in the sense that for $Ω=B(0,1)$ there cannot exist solutions with a positive blow-up point at the origin and four negative blow-up points placed on the vertices of a square centered at the origin. Surprisingly there do exist solutions on $Ω=B(0,1)$ with a positive blow-up point at the origin and four blow-up points on the vertices of a square with alternating positive and negative signs. The results of our paper show that the structure of the set of blow-up solutions of the above problem offers fascinating features and is not well understood.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.