Paper detail

Multi-Access Distributed Computing

Coded distributed computing (CDC) is a new technique proposed with the purpose of decreasing the intense data exchange required for parallelizing distributed computing systems. Under the famous MapReduce paradigm, this coded approach has been shown to decrease this communication overhead by a factor that is linearly proportional to the overall computation load during the mapping phase. Nevertheless, it is widely accepted that this overhead remains a main bottleneck in distributed computing. To address this, we take a new approach and we explore a new system model which, for the same aforementioned overall computation load of the mapping phase, manages to provide astounding reductions of the communication overhead and, perhaps counterintuitively, a substantial increase of the computational parallelization. In particular, we propose multi-access distributed computing (MADC) as a novel generalization of the original CDC model, where now mappers and reducers are distinct computing nodes that are connected through a multi-access network topology. Focusing on the MADC setting with combinatorial topology, which implies $Λ$ mappers and $K$ reducers such that there is a unique reducer connected to any $α$ mappers, we propose a novel coded scheme and a novel information-theoretic converse, which jointly identify the optimal inter-reducer communication load to within a constant gap of $1.5$. Additionally, a modified coded scheme and converse identify the optimal max-link communication load across all existing links to within a gap of $4$. The unparalleled coding gains reported here should not be simply credited to having access to more mapped data, but rather to the powerful role of topology in effectively aligning mapping outputs. This realization raises the open question of which multi-access network topology guarantees the best possible performance in distributed computing.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.