Paper detail

Multi-Access Coded Caching Schemes from Maximal Cross Resolvable Designs

We study the problem of multi-access coded caching (MACC): a central server has $N$ files, $K$ ($K \leq N$) caches each of which stores $M$ out of the $N$ files, $K$ users each of which demands one out of the $N$ files, and each user accesses $z$ caches. The objective is to jointly design the placement, delivery, and user-to-cache association, to optimize the achievable rate. This problem has been extensively studied in the literature under the assumption that a user accesses only one cache. However, when a user accesses more caches, this problem has been studied only under the assumption that a user accesses $z$ consecutive caches with a cyclic wrap-around over the boundaries. A natural question is how other user-to-cache associations fare against the cyclic wrap-around user-to-cache association. A bipartite graph can describe a general user-to-cache association. We identify a class of bipartite graphs that, when used as a user-to-cache association, achieves either a lesser rate or a lesser subpacketization than all other existing MACC schemes using a cyclic wrap-around user-to-cache association. The placement and delivery strategy of our MACC scheme is constructed using a combinatorial structure called maximal cross resolvable design.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.