Paper detail

Multi-access Coded Caching Schemes From Cross Resolvable Designs

We present a novel caching and coded delivery scheme for a multi-access network where multiple users can have access to the same cache (shared cache) and any cache can assist multiple users. This scheme is obtained from resolvable designs satisfying certain conditions which we call {\it cross resolvable designs}. To be able to compare different multi-access coded schemes with different number of users we normalize the rate of the schemes by the number of users served. Based on this per-user-rate we show that our scheme performs better than the well known Maddah-Ali - Nieson (MaN) scheme and the recently proposed ("Multi-access coded caching : gains beyond cache-redundancy" by Serbetci, Parrinello and Elia) SPE scheme. It is shown that the resolvable designs from affine planes are cross resolvable designs and our scheme based on these performs better than the MaN scheme for large memory size cases. The exact size beyond which our performance is better is also presented. The SPE scheme considers only the cases where the product of the number of users and the normalized cache size is 2, whereas the proposed scheme allows different choices depending on the choice of the cross resolvable design.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.