Paper detail

Mucin-inspired, high molecular weight virus binding inhibitors show biphasic binding behavior to influenza A viruses

Multivalent virus binding inhibitors are a promising new class of antivirals, preventing virus infection of cells by inhibiting the first step in the viral infection cycle - binding of viruses to the cell surface. The design of multivalent virus binding inhibitors is complex as many properties, such as inhibitor size and functionalization with virus attachment factors, have a strong impact on the inhibition efficiency. In this study, we synthesized virus binding inhibitors, the design of which has been inspired by mucins, which are naturally occurring glycosylated proteins with molecular weights in the MDa range and which show high affinity in the interaction with various viruses. Hyperbranched polyglycerols (hPG), serving as polymeric scaffolds, were functionalized with sialic acids and sulfate groups at degrees of functionalization as suggested from the structure of mucins. The molecular weights of the hPG-based inhibitors ranged between 10 and 2600 kDa, thereby hitting the size of mucins (MDa scale) and allowing for comparing the inhibition efficiency of the largest, mucin-sized inhibitor (2600 kDa) with related inhibitors of lower molecular weight. Inhibition efficiencies were determined by various methods based on the inhibition of influenza A virus (IAV) binding to lipid membranes, including an assay based on total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy that allows for probing the interaction of IAV with its native attachment factor, sialic acid. Potent inhibition is observed in all assays already at pM concentrations for the mucin-sized inhibitor, while decreasing the inhibitor's molecular weight also decreased its inhibition efficiency. In addition, a biphasic binding behavior of the inhibitors to IAV is observed, which is attributed to differences in the binding affinity to two IAV envelope proteins, neuraminidase and hemagglutinin.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.