Paper detail

MRSaiFE: Tissue Heating Prediction for MRI: a Feasibility Study

A to-date unsolved and highly limiting safety concern for Ultra High-Field (UHF) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the deposition of radiofrequency (RF) power in the body, quantified by the specific absorption rate (SAR), leading to dangerous tissue heating/damage in the form of local SAR hotspots that cannot currently be measured/monitored, thereby severely limiting the applicability of the technology for clinical practice and in regulatory approval. The goal of this study has been to show proof of concept of an artificial intelligence (AI) based exam-integrated real-time MRI safety prediction software (MRSaiFE) facilitating the safe generation of 3T and 7T images by means of accurate local SAR-monitoring at sub-W/kg levels. We trained the software with a small database of image as a feasibility study and achieved successful proof of concept for both field strengths. SAR patterns were predicted with a residual root mean squared error (RSME) of <11% along with a structural similarity (SSIM) level of >84% for both field strengths (3T and 7T).

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.