Paper detail

MP3: A More Efficient Private Presence Protocol

This paper proposes MP3, the second privacy-preserving presence protocol that leaks no information about the graph structure of the social network. Several cryptographic techniques are applied to improve the existing DP5 protocol---the first privacy-preserving presence protocol---while maintaining the same level of privacy. The key contribution of this paper is the use of a dynamic broadcast encryption scheme to reduce the size of the presence database. This enables cheaper registration and lookup required for the protocol. As compared to DP5, MP3 requires on the order of ten times less bandwidth of the servers during registration, and requires on the order of two times less bandwidth for lookup, for a small number of users ($N=10000$). Furthermore, these savings asymptotically increase with the number of users. The client-side latency is also improved significantly in MP3, as compared with DP5. We provide an evaluation of the performance and scalability of both protocols.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.