Paper detail

Motivic Landweber exact theories and their effective covers

Let $k$ be a field of characteristic zero and let $(F,R)$ be a Landweber exact formal group law. We consider a Landweber exact $T$-spectrum $\mathcal{E}:=R\otimes_{\mathbb{L}}\text{MGL}$ and its effective cover $f_0\mathcal{E}\to \mathcal{E}$ with respect to Voevodsky's slice tower. The coefficient ring $R_0$ of $f_0\mathcal{E}$ is the subring of $R$ consisting of elements of $R$ of non-positive degree; the power series $F\in R[[u,v]]$ has coefficients in $R_0$ although $(F,R_0)$ is not necessarily Landweber exact. We show that the geometric part $X\mapsto f_0\mathcal{E}^*(X):=(f_0\mathcal{E})^{2*,*}(X)$ of $f_0\mathcal{E}$ is canonically isomorphic to the oriented cohomology theory $X\mapsto R_0 \otimes_{\mathbb{L}} Ω^*(X)$, where $Ω^*$ is the theory of algebraic cobordism, as defined by Levine-Morel. This recovers results of Dai-Levine as the special case of algebraic $K$-theory and its effective cover, connective algebraic $K$-theory.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.