Paper detail

Most likely paths to error when estimating the mean of a reflected random walk

It is known that simulation of the mean position of a Reflected Random Walk (RRW) $\{W_n\}$ exhibits non-standard behavior, even for light-tailed increment distributions with negative drift. The Large Deviation Principle (LDP) holds for deviations below the mean, but for deviations at the usual speed above the mean the rate function is null. This paper takes a deeper look at this phenomenon. Conditional on a large sample mean, a complete sample path LDP analysis is obtained. Let $I$ denote the rate function for the one dimensional increment process. If $I$ is coercive, then given a large simulated mean position, under general conditions our results imply that the most likely asymptotic behavior, $ψ^*$, of the paths $n^{-1} W_{\lfloor tn\rfloor}$ is to be zero apart from on an interval $[T_0,T_1]\subset[0,1]$ and to satisfy the functional equation \begin{align*} \nabla I\left(\ddtψ^*(t)\right)=λ^*(T_1-t) \quad \text{whenever } ψ(t)\neq 0. \end{align*} If $I$ is non-coercive, a similar, but slightly more involved, result holds. These results prove, in broad generality, that Monte Carlo estimates of the steady-state mean position of a RRW have a high likelihood of over-estimation. This has serious implications for the performance evaluation of queueing systems by simulation techniques where steady state expected queue-length and waiting time are key performance metrics. The results show that naïve estimates of these quantities from simulation are highly likely to be conservative.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.